Source: https://news24online.com/india/year-2025-rss-turns-100-legacy-of-most-powerful-hndutva-right-wing-organisation/430862/Date of Publication: 2025-01-04
Name of Publication: News24
Abstract
The article discusses the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) approaching its centenary in 2025. It frames RSS as a powerful right-wing Hindutva organization, examining its political influence, historical role, and its links to the BJP. It reflects on its ideology, key figures, and controversies associated with its social and political activities.
Sentiment
| Sentiment | Score | Analysis |
| India | | The tone is mixed, presenting RSS as influential but linking it to controversies, which introduces a neutral to slightly critical perspective. |
| Hindu | | Hinduism is referenced primarily through its association with Hindutva ideology without detailed exploration of broader cultural aspects. |
| Hindutva | | The term “Hindutva” is framed critically, aligning it with political dominance and right-wing narratives, suggesting a negative sentiment based on ideological framing. |
Bias Analysis
| Bias | Score | Analysis |
| Language | | The tone is mixed, presenting RSS as influential but linking it to controversies, which introduces a neutral to slightly critical perspective. |
| Source | | The article does not cite sources from RSS-aligned thinkers or pro-Hindu voices, reflecting a limited perspective. |
| Repersentation | | Hindutva is primarily portrayed as politically aggressive, with minimal context about its cultural or nationalistic motivations. |
| Mischaracterization | | No factual inaccuracies, but selective emphasis on controversies without a balanced account of RSS’s social initiatives. |
Intent Analysis
| Intent | Score | Analysis |
| Informative | 3 | |
| Persuasive | 4 | |
| Narrative | 3 | |
| Expressive | 4 | |
| Directive | 1 | |
Emotions Analysis
| Emotions | Score | Analysis |
| Outrage | 4 | |
| Empathy | 2 | |
| Shock | 2 | |
| Hope | 1 | |
| Fear | 3 | |
| Neutral | 2 | |
Notes:
The article presents a predominantly critical portrayal of RSS with a focus on its political influence and controversies, consistent with broader media narratives of Hindutva organizations. The framing choices indicate bias through language and selective representation.
