Source: https://countercurrents.org/2025/01/hindutva-sought-to-be-injected-into-indias-foreign-policy-for-hegemony-over-bangladesh/Date of Publication: 2025-01-03
Name of Publication: Countercurrents
Abstract
The article critiques perceived attempts by Hindutva-oriented groups to influence India’s foreign policy, particularly concerning Bangladesh. It describes these actions as ideologically driven moves to establish regional dominance. It references cultural and religious rhetoric and actions tied to RSS-affiliated ideologies as potentially detrimental to India’s diplomatic relations with its neighbor.
Sentiment
| Sentiment | Score | Analysis |
| India | | The tone suggests India’s foreign policy is influenced by aggressive Hindutva strategies, framing it as hegemonic rather than cooperative. |
| Hindu | | The portrayal of Hindu cultural and political expressions as tools for dominance reflects a strong anti-Hindu sentiment. |
| Hindutva | | The article describes Hindutva ideology in highly negative terms, associating it with expansionism and intolerance. |
Bias Analysis
| Bias | Score | Analysis |
| Language | | The tone suggests India’s foreign policy is influenced by aggressive Hindutva strategies, framing it as hegemonic rather than cooperative. |
| Source | | References to actions attributed to Hindutva groups rely on speculative or critical interpretations without citations from primary pro-Hindutva sources. |
| Repersentation | | The representation of Hindutva as a monolithic and inherently aggressive force lacks nuance. |
| Mischaracterization | | Hindutva is framed as solely a political strategy for dominance, disregarding its cultural or socio-spiritual contexts. |
Intent Analysis
| Intent | Score | Analysis |
| Informative | 2 | |
| Persuasive | 5 | |
| Narrative | 3 | |
| Expressive | 4 | |
| Directive | 1 | |
Emotions Analysis
| Emotions | Score | Analysis |
| Outrage | 5 | |
| Empathy | 2 | |
| Shock | 3 | |
| Hope | 1 | |
| Fear | 4 | |
| Neutral | 2 | |
Notes:
The article presents a highly critical view of Hindutva’s role in India’s foreign policy. It exhibits significant bias, predominantly negative sentiment, and persuasive intent. It frames Hindutva ideology as expansionist and detrimental to Bangladesh relations without adequately balancing perspectives or supporting claims with neutral sources. The language, tone, and representation align with previously identified anti-Hindu narratives found in files like all_anti_hindu.pdf.
