Source: https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/modis-nationalists-demand-destruction-of-thief-emperors-tomb-gd5p2zr3hDate of Publication: 2025/03/12
Name of Publication: The Times
Abstract
The article discusses demands by Hindu nationalist allies of Prime Minister Narendra Modi to demolish the tomb of Mughal emperor Aurangzeb in Maharashtra. They label Aurangzeb as a ‘thief’ and ‘looter,’ reflecting longstanding tensions due to his historical actions perceived as oppressive towards Hindus. The site, protected by the Archaeological Society of India, faces opposition from BJP members, including MP Udayanraje Bhosale and Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis. This movement aligns with the government’s broader agenda to reinterpret Indian history by minimizing the Mughal legacy, evident in actions like renaming places and altering textbooks. Critics argue that such rhetoric is divisive and detracts from pressing issues like employment.
Sentiment
| Sentiment | Score | Analysis |
| India | | The article portrays internal conflicts and cultural tensions, suggesting a negative sentiment towards national unity. |
| Hindu | | While highlighting Hindu nationalist actions, it presents a neutral stance by also mentioning criticisms of these actions. |
| Hindutva | | The piece associates Hindutva-driven initiatives with divisive historical reinterpretations, indicating a negative sentiment. |
Bias Analysis
| Bias | Score | Analysis |
| Language | | Terms like ‘demand destruction’ and ‘thief emperor’ convey a strong negative bias towards Hindu nationalist actions. |
| Source | | The article references both proponents and critics, but lacks direct quotes from neutral historians or experts. |
| Repersentation | | Focuses on the actions of Hindu nationalists without equally exploring broader public opinion or historical context. |
| Mischaracterization | | While presenting factual information, the emphasis on certain narratives may lead to a skewed perception. |
Intent Analysis
| Intent | Score | Analysis |
| Informative | 4 | Provides details on the demands and historical context. |
| Persuasive | 3 | Highlights criticisms of the nationalist agenda, subtly influencing reader opinion. |
| Narrative | 2 | Lacks a storytelling approach, focusing more on reporting facts. |
| Expressive | 2 | Minimal use of emotive language, maintaining a formal tone. |
| Directive | 1 | Does not instruct or call readers to action. |
Emotions Analysis
| Emotions | Score | Analysis |
| Outrage | 3 | The demand to destroy a historical monument may surprise readers. |
| Empathy | 4 | Describing Aurangzeb as a ‘thief’ and ‘looter’ evokes strong disapproval. |
| Shock | 2 | Limited content to foster empathy towards any group. |
| Hope | 1 | Does not convey optimism or aspirations. |
| Fear | 3 | Raises concerns about potential cultural conflicts. |
| Neutral | 3 | Maintains a balanced tone despite the contentious topic. |
Notes:
The piece reflects ongoing debates about historical narratives in India and their impact on contemporary politics.
